Say MOOC

No sooner did I push the publish button for one of my latest post on Facebook sharing, that I fell on this other gem of an article, form Campus Technology, reporting a spectacular series of stupidities.

Article title is: Research: Facebook May Keep Students in MOOCs, from April 28th.

Let’s read the introductory part:

(1) Researchers at Pennsylvania State University have published a study that suggests students may be more likely to stick with massive open online courses (MOOCs) if they use Facebook.
(2) Saijing Zheng, a former doctoral student at Penn State and current research scientist at Microsoft led the research and said she found that open course students were more engaged on Facebook groups and preferred interacting more on the social media site than through the course tools.
(3) That may be good news for MOOC instructors who, according to Zheng, get frustrated because 90 percent of students who enroll in MOOCs leave the course after less than two weeks.
(4) “Social media may provide another communication channel for the students,” Zheng said. “Current MOOC platforms do not include collaborative features for students to work together or good conversation channels between students and between students and teachers.”

I divided the quote into 4 paragraphs according to the following notes and observations.

  1. Students may be more likely to stick with MOOCs if they use Facebook.
    This is, of course, a terrible thing to say. First there is the “stick” business. Students like asses. If they have to stick with a course, students must be really alienated by the course itself. As we’ll see later, instead of addressing this alienation by providing opportunities and tools for students to own the course, an easy (and wrong) solution is found within Facebook.
  2. The second point illustrates why students find the MOOCs alienating: MOOC students were more engaged on Facebook groups and preferred interacting more on the social media site than through the course tools. Well, if you have a course with 10,000 students and your assignments are evaluated and corrected by machines or by peer-based algorithms, it’s easy to see a students who wants to stick with the course will look for small-scale dialogue within some other platform he knows about.
    Then, point number…
  3. shows alarming data, if true. 90% dropout rate means the course is for superhumans, not students. Then, next and last point is crucial:
  4. You correct the design failure of the commercial MOOCs not by providing adequate interaction affordances **within** the course, but instead of fixing the problem you add another silos to the equation. Facebook. Which, at least can work as groupware and messaging system.

Thus, two errors put in series correct the original fail? Why don’t these researchers search for real-life tools actually used in work situations? Like Slack, for instance? Why do we have to look for diluted and not-authentic environments to provide students with educational experiences? [Note I’m not saying “to deliver them course content”, by Jove].

I’m really appalled by the topic chosen for this “research”. If research in education goes this way, well, we’ll find Trump soon to tell how it’s going to end.

Featured Image:


flickr photo shared by audreywatters under a Creative Commons ( BY-SA ) license

Antonio Vantaggiato
antonio-vantaggiato@blogs.netedu.info

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.